TOP

5 things to like — and a few notes — about Madera Theatre Project’s ‘Beauty and the Beast’

The Madera Theatre Project offers its inaugural production, “Disney’s Beauty and the Beast,” in a run that concludes Saturday, June 25. I attended the Friday performance of opening weekend.

When I attended a Blossom Trail Players production of “Bye Bye Birdie” in 2017, I wrote: “Like any flower, a new theater company can be something delicate that needs nurturing.” I’m continuing that approach with “Beauty and the Beast.” I’m not offering a standard review of the production, which struggles at times, but I want to share five things I like about it — plus some constructive comments I hope can help the company raise the bar as it looks toward a promising future.

Five things I like:

1. The title characters. Emily Swalef is strong in the role, offering very good vocals and a self-assured stage presence. The Beast. German Gutierrez, also in fine voice, offers a sensitive, sonorous presence.


Related story: MADERA THEATRE PROJECT OPENS WITH BIG DREAMS (AND EASY HIGHWAY 99 ACCESS)

2. The Enchanted Objects. Standouts are Sarah Sherwood as Babette and Jasmine Swalef as Madame De La Grande Bouche, both with beautiful voices. James Hume is a spirited Lumiere, and Olivia Hayes, as Mrs. Potts, does a nice job with the title number.

3. The Beast’s transformation is intriguing. Director Jacob Sherwood eschews the usual swirl-and-smoke switch from hideous monster to handsome prince. Instead, in a nod to modern dance, two ensemble members remove the Beast’s costume in full view of the audience. When the head of the costume is removed, it’s a dramatic moment.

4. The new Matilda Torres High School Performing Arts Center is beautiful. It’s a great size and feels like it has a lot of technical promise. For a theater company to call it home base is a privilege, indeed.

SPONSORED CONTENT


5. The enthusiasm and dedication of the cast. I’m guessing that for many, this is their first time on stage. It’s wonderful to think of what it means to bring live community theater to a city.

Now, on to some notes:

The lighting feels rudimentary. Staged in a minimalistic style, the production relies heavily on a professionally designed Disney video background. However, the live lighting design needs to be better integrated with the video, which sometimes felt washed out because of the overall brightness.

The movement of set pieces is visually jarring. Stagehands often bring on and take off various pieces in full view of the audience. Consider having costumed ensemble members do that work, or, at the very least, bring the lights way down.

Think more about the overall color palette of the production. Some of the costumes in the show don’t feel as if they fit in, particularly the shiny purple and yellow outfits in “Be Our Guest.”

The crowd needs more individuation in the ensemble scenes. Some members of the ensemble don’t have much personality. Each one needs his or her own story – what is their character’s role/occupation/position in this town? Are they gregarious, snooty, open-minded or judgmental? The audience may never know those stories, but we can tell when someone feels like a distinct individual and not just a human prop.

The choreography needs to be more precise and confident. The dancing is often what separates a just OK community theater show from a really good one. This might come across as tough love, but if you don’t have the requisite dancing abilities in a cast, maybe another title should be considered.

Think twice about playing much of the action in the crossover row that divides the theater’s seating area. It’s one thing to have actors march through or create a stereo sound during a song. But asking a majority of your audience members to crane their necks backwards to catch key dialogue or moments doesn’t work.

Still, I come back to a simple truth: Theater matters. And this is a promising beginning. I’m sure the memories made by the cast members of this “Beauty and the Beast” will last lifetimes. And it makes me happy to think of the children in the audience experiencing live theater for the first time. I’m looking forward to watching Madera Theatre Project continue its inaugural season (“Harvest Moon” opens July 7, and “All My Sons” opens July 28) and get even better in years to come.


The Munro Review has no paywall but is financially supported by readers who believe in its non-profit mission of bringing professional arts journalism to the central San Joaquin Valley. You can help by signing up for a monthly recurring paid membership or make a one-time donation of as little as $3. All memberships and donations are tax-deductible.

Covering the arts online in the central San Joaquin Valley and beyond. Lover of theater, classical music, visual arts, the literary arts and all creative endeavors. Former Fresno Bee arts critic and columnist. Graduate of Columbia University and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. Excited to be exploring the new world of arts journalism.

donaldfresnoarts@gmail.com

Comments (2)

  • Ginger

    It would also be a good idea not to select a show currently on another company’s season, bad form there in my view.

    reply
    • Ann

      This show was decided long before “another company” announced their show. Madera is in an entirely different county, and what IS bad form is to bash another company for simply doing the same show, which, by the way, is a common occurrence. There is no crime against two companies doing the same show. Threatened much? My two cents.

      reply

Leave a Reply